Necessity of routine perioperative epidural catheter placement in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a retrospective data analysis.

PURPOSE: Whether epidural anesthesia leads to further improvement in the postoperative course of colorectal procedures is under discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of minimally invasive colorectal oncological interventions without epidural anesthesia (EDA). METHODS: This retrospective data analysis included the clinical data of all patients who underwent minimally invasive oncological colorectal resection at our clinic between January 2013 and April 2019. Of 385 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 183 (group I; 47.5% of 385) received EDA, and 202 (group II; 52.5% of 385) received transversus abdominis plane block instead. The relevant target parameters were evaluated and compared between the groups. The postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: The patients in group I (n=183; women, 77; men, 106; age 66.8 years) were younger (p=0.0035), received a urinary catheter more often (99.5% versus [vs.] 28.2% p<0.001), required longer, more frequent arterenol treatment (1.1 vs. 0.6 days; p<0.001), and had a longer intermediate care unit stay than those in group II (2.8 vs. 1.1 days; p<0.001). Postoperative pain levels were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.078). The patients in group I were able to ambulate later than those in group II (4 vs. 2 days; p<0.001). The difference in the postoperative day of the first defecation was not significant between the groups (p=0.236). The incidence of postoperative complications such as bleeding (p=0.396), anastomotic leaks (p=0.113), and wound infections (p=0.641) did not differ between the groups. The patients in group I had significantly longer hospital stays than those in group II (12.2 vs. 9.4 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: EDA can be safely omitted from elective minimally invasive colorectal resections, and its omission is not accompanied by any relevant disadvantages to the patient.

Reconstruction, oversewing, or taking the anastomosis down - which surgical intervention is most potent in the treatment of anastomotic leaks following colorectal resections?

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) following colorectal resections can be treated interventionally. However, most cases require surgical intervention. Thus, several surgical techniques are available, which intend to affect the further course positively. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to determine which surgical technique proves to have the biggest potential in reducing the morbidity and mortality as well as to minimize the need of re-interventions after AL. METHODS: All patients with a history of AL following colorectal resection between 2008 and 2020 were analyzed. Patient's outcomes following surgical treatment of AL, including morbidity and mortality, clinical and para-clinical (laboratory examinations, ultrasound, and CT-scan) detection of AL recurrence, re-intervention rate, and the length of hospital stay were documented and correlated with the surgical technique used (e.g. simply over-sewing the AL, over-sewing the AL with the construction of a protective ileostomy, resection and reconstruction of the anastomosis, peritoneal lavage and transanal drainage, or taking the anastomosis down and constructing an end stoma). RESULTS: A total of 2,724 colorectal resections were documented. Grade C AL occurred in 92 (4.4% AL occurrence-rate) and 31 (7.2% AL occurrence-rate) cases following colon and rectal resections, respectively. The anastomosis was not preservable in 52 and 17 cases following colon and rectal resections, respectively. Therefore, the anastomosis had been taken down and an end-stoma had been constructed. Over-sewing the AL with the construction of a protective ileostomy had the highest anastomosis preservation rate (14 of 18 cases) and lowest re-intervention rate (mean value of 1.5 re-interventions) following colon and rectal resections (7 of 9 cases; mean value, 1.5 re-interventions). CONCLUSION: In cases where an AL is preservable, over-sewing the anastomosis and constructing a protective ileostomy has the greatest potential for positive short-term outcomes following colorectal resections.

Robotic colorectal resection in combination with a multimodal enhanced recovery program - results of the first 100 cases.

PURPOSE: In Germany, colorectal robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has found its way and is currently used as primary technique in colorectal resections at our clinic. We investigated whether RAS can be extensively combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) in a large prospective patient group. METHODS: Using the DaVinci Xi surgical robot, all colorectal RAS from 09/2020 to 01/2022 were incorporated into our ERAS® program. Perioperative data were prospectively recorded using a data documentation system. The extent of resection, duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, and postoperative short-term results were analyzed. We documented the postoperative duration of Intermediate Care Unit (IMC) stay and major and minor complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, anastomotic leak rate, reoperation rate, hospital-stay length, and ERAS® guideline adherence. RESULTS: One hundred patients (65 colon and 35 rectal resections) were included (median age: 69 years). The median durations of surgery were 167 min (colon resection) and 246 min (rectal resection). Postoperatively, four patients were IMC-treated (median stay: 1 day). In 92.5% of the colon and 88.6% of the rectum resections, no or minor complications occurred postoperatively. The anastomotic leak rate was 3.1% in colon and 5.7% in rectal resection. The reoperation rate was 7.7% (colon resection) and 11.4% (rectal resection). The hospital stay length was 5 days (colon resection) and 6.5 days (rectal resection). The ERAS® guideline adherence rate was 88% (colon resection) and 82.6% (rectal resection). CONCLUSION: Patient perioperative therapy per the multimodal ERAS® concept is possible without any problems in colorectal RAS, leading to low morbidity and short hospital stays.

Laparoscopic rectal resection without epidural catheters-does it work?

PURPOSE: Placement of an epidural catheter (EC) in colorectal resections is still recommended as a valid measure to achieve a low level of pain. However, EC is associated with increased invasiveness and with an increased risk of bladder emptying disorders and a decrease in blood pressure, which all relate to delayed mobilization. Preliminary data shows that EC placement may not be necessary for laparoscopic colon resections. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate how the omission of EC placement influences short-term postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic rectal resections. METHODS: All laparoscopic rectal resections occurring between 2013 and 2020 were prospectively examined. Resections from January 2013 to February 2018 (group A) were compared with resections from March 2018 to December 2020 (group B; after the internal change of the perioperative pain regime). In addition to EC placement, the other target parameters of our study were urinary catheter placement during the inpatient stay, postoperative pain > 3 days on a numerical rating scale (NRS), mobilization in the first 5 postoperative days, time until the first postoperative bowel movement, postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo, intermediate care unit stay (IMC stay) in days, and hospital length of stay in days. RESULTS: In the entire study period, 221 laparoscopic rectal resections were performed: 122 in group A and 99 resections in group B. The frequency of EC placement and urinary catheter placement, postoperative IMC stay, and hospital length of stay was significantly lower in group B (p < 0.05). The postoperative mobilization of patients in group B was possible more quickly. There were no differences in the level of pain, time until the first postoperative bowel movement, and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo. CONCLUSION: Omission of EC placement in laparoscopic rectal resections led to faster mobilization, a shorter IMC stay, and a shorter hospital stay without increasing the pain level. Postoperative complications did not change when an EC was not placed. Therefore, routine EC placement in laparoscopic rectal resections is unnecessary.

[First 18 months as certified ERAS® center for colorectal cancer : Lessons learned and results of the first 261 patients]. / Achtzehn Monate als zertifiziertes ERAS®-Zentrum für kolorektale Resektionen : "Lessons learned" und Ergebnisse der ersten 261 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) describes a multimodal, interdisciplinary and interprofessional treatment concept that optimizes the postoperative convalescence of the patient through the use of evidence-based measures. GOAL OF THE WORK: The aim of this article is to present the experiences of our center certified by the ERAS® Society for colorectal resections 18 months after successful implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since the beginning of the certification 261 patients have been treated in our clinic according to the specifications of the ERAS® concept. As a comparison group the last 50 patients prior to implementation were evaluated in terms of compliance with ERAS® requirements, length of hospital stay and readmission rate, the need for care in an intensive or intermediate care ward, the number of necessary reoperations and the complication rate. RESULTS: Compliance increased from 39.3% preERAS® to 81.1% after ERAS® implementation (p < 0.001). At the same time the length of stay of ERAS® patients was reduced from 7 days to 5 days (p = 0.001). While the rate of surgical complications was the same between the two groups (p = 0.236), nonsurgical complications occurred significantly less frequently in the ERAS® cohort (p = 0.018). DISCUSSION: There are well-known stumbling blocks in implementing and maintaining an ERAS® concept; however, it is worthwhile for the patient to circumnavigate this and establish ERAS® as the standard treatment path.

[Implementation of a fast track program : Challenges and solution approaches]. / Implementierung eines Fast-Track-Programmes : Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze.

BACKGROUND: For more than a decade the evolving concept of fast track surgery has been implemented, predominantly in colorectal surgery. The practice of fast track surgery has yielded excellent results concerning reduction of postoperative complications and hospital stay and has been shown to increase patient satisfaction; however, several studies have shown a sometimes alarmingly low rate of implementation of the individual fast track measures and the rate is a maximum of 44%. OBJECTIVE: In this review, obstacles for implementation of fast track surgery are investigated. Advice is given on possible solutions to circumvent obstacles and facilitate successful establishment of multimodal recovery protocols in individual institutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The current international literature is critically evaluated and discussed with a particular focus on prospective clinical trials and expert recommendations. RESULTS: The reasons for a lack of adherence to fast track surgery principles have been shown to be multifactorial. Time-consuming expenditure, logistic difficulties, lack of support by colleagues as well as limitations in the healthcare system and patient-dependent factors appear to complicate implementation of fast track programs. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation and long-term perpetuation can be achieved only by an interdisciplinary team with a low level hierarchy, continuous training and a positive feedback culture. An early inclusion and clarification of personnel and patients should be firmly integrated into the fast track concept. This results in a higher satisfaction of patients and personnel and subsequently stronger adherence to the fast track concept.

Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal - Results from a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy reversal is frequently performed in abdominal surgery. Postoperative complications after ileostomy reversal are encountered in around 20% of patients. Data regarding risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy closure are scarce. The purpose of this prospective trial was to determine risk factors for operative revision after ileostomy closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an additional post hoc analysis of a two center prospective trial. After enrollment, patient characteristics and intraoperative details were analyzed. Patients were followed up at one postoperative visit before discharge and at a three months postoperative visit by standardized questionnaire. All reoperations occurring in the three months period after surgery were analyzed, and immediate reoperations which were directly related to the ileostomy reversal were analyzed separately. RESULTS: 118 patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included in the trial. 12 out of 106 patients (11.3%) underwent any reoperation within three months after surgery (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb). On multivariate analysis, anemia was associated with any reoperation p = 0.004; OR 6.93 (95% CI 1.37-30.07). Six out of 114 patients (5.3%) required an immediate reoperation (small bowel perforation, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, deep wound infection) due to surgical complications directly related to the ileostomy reversal. Higher body mass index and anemia were associated with immediate reoperations (BMI: p = 0.038; OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.98); anemia: p = 0.001; OR 25.50 (95% CI 3.87-168.21). CONCLUSION: Surgical complications after ileostomy reversal occurred to a substantial extent. Rate of reoperations was associated with anemia and high body mass index. Optimizing patients in terms of preoperative hemoglobin and BMI may reduce surgical complications after ileostomy closure.

Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

PURPOSE: Data regarding length of hospital stay of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal are very heterogeneous. There are many factors that may have an influence on the length of postoperative hospital stay, such as postoperative wound infections. One potential strategy to reduce their incidence and to decrease hospital stay is to insert subcutaneous suction drains. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the insertion of subcutaneous suction drains on hospital stay and postoperative wound infections in ileostomy reversal. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were determined. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled two-center non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups. The total length of hospital stay as primary endpoint and the occurrence of a surgical site infection, the colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, and the occurrence of hematomas/seromas as secondary endpoints were monitored. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included. Fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to insertion of a subcutaneous suction drain, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to receive no drain. After 3 months of follow-up, 50 patients in the group with drain and 53 patients in the group without drain could be analyzed. Median total length of hospital stay was 8 days in the SD group and 9 days in the group without SD (p = 0.17). Fourteen percent of patients with SD and 17 % without SD developed SSI, p = 0.68. Multivariate analysis revealed anemia (p < 0.01), intraoperative bowel perforation (p = 0.02) and resident (p = 0.04) or fellow (p = 0.048) performing the operation as risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows that the omission of subcutaneous suction drains is not inferior to the use of subcutaneous suction drains after ileostomy reversal in terms of length of hospital stay, surgical site infections, and hematomas/seromas.

[Watchful waiting vs surgical repair of oligosymptomatic incisional hernias: Current status of the AWARE study]. / Beobachtung vs. Operation oligosymptomatischer Narbenhernien : Aktueller Stand der AWARE-Studie.

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are one of the the most frequent complications in visceral surgery and incisional hernia repair has a relevant complication rate. Therefore, there have to be solid indications before carrying out incisional hernia repair. To date, there is a lack of evidence concerning the correct indications for surgical repair of incisional hernias. The AWARE trial compares watchful waiting to surgical repair of incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The AWARE trial is a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic incisional hernia are randomized into the watchful waiting or the surgical repair group with a follow-up of 2 years. The primary endpoint is pain during normal activities due to the hernia or the hernia repair after 2 years measured on the hernia-specific surgical pain scale (SPS). RESULTS: In this study 36 centers are participating throughout Germany, more than 1600 patients had been screened up to 31 December 2014 and 234 (14.6%) of the screened patients could be recruited. CONCLUSION: The AWARE study will provide evidence concerning the two therapeutic options of watchful waiting and surgical repair of incisional hernia.

[Intraoperative complications of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Prevention, recognition and therapy]. / Intraoperative Komplikationen des unteren Gastrointestinaltraktes : Prävention, Erkennung, Therapie.

Every surgical intervention is associated with the risk of intraoperative complications. These occur in approximately 2-12% of patients but significantly influence the postoperative outcome, overall complication and mortality rates. This article presents the treatment of typical intraoperative complications during surgery of the lower gastrointestinal tract with a focus on the prevention and identification of risk factors. Especially changes in the regular anatomy caused by previous surgery, inflammation, tumors and emergency situations carry the risk of iatrogenic injuries to the bowels, spleen, ureter and blood vessels. These risk factors must be considered when choosing a surgical procedure, a surgical approach or an appropriate surgeon. The early detection of complications with a definitive restoration is the essential step for a successful treatment without long-term sequelae. Every delay in therapy is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality and should be avoided.

Therapy of complicated Crohn's disease during pregnancy--an interdisciplinary challenge.

BACKGROUND: Severe courses of Crohn's disease (CD) during pregnancy are rare. However, if occurring, the risk of miscarriage and low birth weight is increased. At present, only limited data is available on the treatment of CD during pregnancy. In particular, there are no standard guidelines for surgical therapy. Nevertheless, surgery is often unavoidable if complications during the course of the disease arise. PURPOSE: This study provides a critical overview of conventional and interventional treatment options for CD complications during pregnancy and analyses the surgical experience gained thus far. For illustrative purposes, clinical cases of three young women with a severe clinical course during pregnancy are presented. METHODS: After treatment-refractory for conservative and interventional measures, surgery remained as the only treatment option. In all cases, a split stoma was created after resection to avoid anastomotic leaks that would endanger the lives of mother and child. The postoperative course of all three patients was uneventful, and pregnancy remained intact until delivery. No further CD specific medication was required before birth. CONCLUSIONS: The management of CD patients during pregnancy requires close interdisciplinary co-operation between gastroenterologists, obstetricians, anaesthetists and visceral surgeons. For the protection of mother and child treatment should thus be delivered in a specialised centre. This article demonstrates the advantages of surgical therapy by focusing on alleviating CD complaints and preventing postoperative complications.

[Proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis : is a multistep procedure in cases of immunosuppression advisable?]. / Die Proktokolektomie bei Colitis ulcerosa : Ist ein mehrzeitiges Vorgehen bei Immunsuppression sinnvoll?

BACKGROUND: The coloproctomucosectomy (CPM) is the procedure of the choice for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In cases with pronounced immunosuppression (IS), a 3-step (3S) procedure [i.e., subtotal colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and finally ileostomy reconstruction] is often selected. Fewer perioperative complications can be expected compared to the 2-step (2S) procedure; however, an additional in-hospital stay and surgical intervention are necessary. The aim of the present study was to compare both approaches using the clinical outcome of our patients undergoing IPAA to determine efficacy of these two concepts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997-2010, a total of 225 patients were operated using a 2S or 3S IPAA procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on the number of surgical steps for the ileoanal pouch procedure and IPAA. The survey was performed within the scope of prospective study. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients with CPM, 66 were excluded due to a diagnosis other than UC (familial adenomatous polyposis, indeterminate colitis, Crohn's disease) and patients with permanent ILS procedures without the possibility or wish for an IPAA (n = 54). Included were 71 patients with 2S (w = 30, m = 41) and 34 patients with 3S procedures (w = 21, m = 13). Compared to the 2S procedure, the 3S procedure was shown to have shorter operation times (246 versus 296 min; p = 0.05), shorter hospital stays (15.5 versus 24.6 days; p = 0.05), shorter intensive care unit stays (3.3 versus 7.2 days; p = 0.05), and fewer major complications (5.9 % versus 22.5 %; p = 0.035). Patients with 3S procedures had a higher BMI (26.2 versus 23.1 kg/m²; p = 0.05) and fewer required IS (10 % vs. 62 %; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The decision for a 3S procedure in UC and pronounced IS is advisable and justified. Using a 3S procedure, immunosuppression and its influence on perioperative morbidity are thus reduced. The IPAA can be performed with shorter operation times, shorter hospital stays and fewer major complications.

[What is the actual benefit of sigmoid resection for acute diverticulitis? : Functional outcome after surgical and conservative treatment]. / Welchen Erfolg bringt die Sigmaresektion bei der akuten Sigmadivertikulitis tatsächlich? : Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach operativer und konservativer Therapie.

INTRODUCTION: The correct therapeutic management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) is still controversially discussed. Essential to the success of therapy is primarily the long-term resolution of Patient symptoms after surgical or conservative therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome after conservative and surgical treatment of Patients with acute SD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive admissions of all Patients with acute SD were prospectively recruited from January 2005 to June 2008 with the exception of a free perforation. The following data were recorded: age, sex, first or recurrent episode of SD, computed tomography (CT) stage, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, persistent symptoms and recurrence after conservative and surgical therapy. Furthermore, information on the rates of postoperative sexual and bladder dysfunction was collected. The long-term outcome was evaluated by a standardized questionnaire. In June 2008 all Patients were contacted using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 153 Patients were included in the study of whom 70 (45.8  %) presented with the first episode, 83 (54.2  %) had a prior history of SD and 40 Patients were treated conservatively whereas 113 Patients were surgically treated by sigmoid resection. Uncomplicated SD was seen in 16 Patients (conservative 4, surgical 12, p = 0.961), phlegmonous SD was seen in 88 cases (conservative 29, surgical 59, p = 0.026) and covered perforated SD in 49 cases (conservative 7, surgical 42, p = 0.022). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 12-52 months). At follow-up 25  % of conservative and 8.8  % of Patients treated surgically complained about persistent symptoms (p = 0.009). The following symptoms occurred (conservative vs. surgery): painful defecation (22.5  % versus 8.8  %, p = 0.024.), constipation (25  % versus 8.8  %, p = 0.009), abdominal cramp (22.5 % versus 4.4  %, p = 0.001) and painful flatulence (25  % versus 8.8  %, p = 0.009). Sexual or bladder dysfunction occurred postoperatively in 7  % and 9  %, respectively. Of the conservatively treated Patients 32.5  % had a recurrence of SD during follow-up compared to 3.5 % of surgically treated Patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of acute SD is more effective than conservative therapy for the prophylaxis of recurrent SD and avoidance of persistent symptoms.

Suitability of a virtual reality simulator for laparoscopic skills assessment in a surgical training course.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulators (VRS) can acquire specific performance parameters for laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of a VRS for the assessment in a surgical skills course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred five attendees of a 7-day surgical skills course were tested with a VRS at the beginning (T1) and at the end (T2) of the course. Two standard VRS tasks (lifting and grasping (LG) and fine dissection (FD)) with two scores and 21 individual parameters were used. VRS performance was correlated to laparoscopic experience and experience in playing video games in order to assess the influence of preexisting skills. RESULTS: The participants improved significantly in both scores and in 19/21 VRS parameters between T1 and T2. Laparoscopic experts were significantly better than novices only for the parameter tissue damage on T1 in LG (41.4 %, P < 0.001). Gamers were significantly better than non-gamers in all manual parameters on T1 in LG. Both groups of laparoscopic experience as well as non-gamers improved between T1 and T2 in LG for most parameters, while gamers only improved for tissue damage. CONCLUSIONS: The VRS was able to assess the gain in surgical performance during the course in general. However, laparoscopic experience and video game experience strongly influenced the results. Laparoscopic experience was correlated to the parameter tissue damage, whereas video game experience was correlated to manual parameters. This knowledge can be used to build adequate scoring systems for VRS and to design tasks that target specific course skills.

Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients?

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications in visceral surgery and are currently considered to be an indication for surgery in all cases, regardless of the patient's symptoms. However, it still remains unclear to what extent surgery actually results in improvement according to objective (e.g., less pain or dysesthesia) or subjective criteria (e.g., less discomfort or better cosmetic result). The purpose of this prospective study was to identify patients who derive objective and subjective benefit from surgical repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair with mesh implantation from December 2006 to April 2009. Data were collected before and 18 months after surgery. Pain intensity was rated on the numerical analog scale (NAS) pre- and postoperatively. Patients were divided into oligosymptomatic (NAS 0-3) and symptomatic (NAS 4-10) groups based on their preoperative pain level, and the postoperative outcome of the two groups was compared by standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled, 45 (50 %) of each gender. Prior to surgery, 43 patients (47.8 %) were oligosymptomatic, and 47 (52.2 %) reported clinically relevant pain. Eighteen months after surgery, 7.5 % of the oligosymptomatic patients complained of clinically relevant pain; its rate remained unchanged. The symptomatic group showed a significant reduction in clinically relevant pain from 100 % to 14.0 %, (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with clinically relevant dysesthesia was 12.5 % in the oligosymptomatic and 20.9 % in the symptomatic group 18 months postoperatively. The overall recurrence rate was 13.3 % after 18 months without difference in both groups. A reduction in discomfort in the surgical area was reported by 77.5 % of the oligosymptomatic and 79.1 % of the symptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic patients definitely profit from surgical repair in the long-term course. However, the notable postoperative rate of clinically relevant pain and dysesthesia in oligosymptomatic patients and their high recurrence rate cast doubt on whether they really benefit from surgical repair. The remarkable degree of subjective satisfaction in oligosymptomatic patients should not be underestimated.

Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL)?--A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are frequent complications in colorectal surgery and may lead to burst abdomen, incisional hernia, and increased perioperative costs. Plastic wound ring drapes (RD) were introduced some decades ago to protect the abdominal wound from bacteria and reduce SSIs. There have been no controlled trials examining the benefit of RD in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL) trial was thus designed to assess their effectiveness in preventing SSIs after elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. MATERIALS/METHODS: REDWIL is a randomized controlled monocenter trial with two parallel groups (experimental group with RD and control group without RD). Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were included. The primary endpoint was SSIs. Secondary outcomes were colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, reoperations/readmissions, early/late postoperative complications, and cost of hospital stay. The duration of follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and October 2010, 109 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group (with or without RD). Forty-six patients in the RD group and 47 patients in the control group completed follow-up. SSIs developed in ten patients with RD (21.7 %) and six patients without RD (12.8 %) (p = 0.28). An intraoperative swab taken from the abdominal wall was positive in 66.7 % of patients with RD and 57.5 % without RD (p = 0.46). The number of species cultured within one swab was significantly higher in those without RD (p = 0.03). The median total inpatient costs including emergency readmissions were 3,402 ± 4,038 in the RD group and 3,563 ± 1,735 in the control group (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: RD do not reduce the rate of SSIs in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The inpatient costs are similar with and without RD.